Vision care outcomes in Virginia present a nuanced mix of statewide achievements and regional challenges. Across the population, many residents experience manageable levels of visual impairment, yet notable disparities persist based on geography and socioeconomic factors. This article provides a statistical deep dive into the key metrics surrounding vision health in Virginia, drawing on data trends from 2005 through 2025.
Analyzing these metrics can be vital for public health planning, resource allocation, and ensuring communities receive the vision care services they need. From prevalence rates to demographic variations, the numbers tell a story of where interventions have succeeded and where gaps remain. Although this article focuses squarely on presenting the data, these figures illuminate areas of both progress and persistent inequities.
Key Highlights
- 7.2% of Virginia’s population experiences uncorrected visual acuity at or below 20/40.
- Adult visual impairment for those age 65 and older stands at 6.0%, in line with the national average.
- Roughly 45,520 children in Virginia (ages 0–17) live with blindness.
- In some rural areas, vision impairment rates are up to 3x the statewide average.
The following sections present more detailed data on prevalence, disparities, regional variations, leading causes of vision loss, and healthcare access. Each section offers bullet points, short transitions, and a relevant data table to better illustrate key findings.
Statewide Prevalence of Vision Impairment
Understanding the overall burden of visual impairment is crucial for grasping the scale of Virginia’s vision care challenges.
- An estimated 7.2% of Virginians have uncorrected visual acuity at or below 20/40, slightly above the 7.0% national rate.
- Among adults 65 and older, 6.0% report visual impairment.
- Individuals 85 years and older exhibit the highest proportion of permanent vision loss at 20%.
- Pediatric blindness affects 45,520 children statewide, underscoring the need for early screening.
These figures set the stage for deeper insights into the patterns and causes of vision problems across different age groups.
| Age Group | Vision Impairment Rate |
|---|---|
| 0-17 | 45,520 blind children (overall count) |
| 65-84 | 12.6% acuity impairment |
| 85+ | 20% permanent vision loss |
Demographic Disparities
Various demographic factors such as income, race, and education are linked to higher or lower rates of vision impairment statewide.
- Low-income groups (<$25k annually) show a 3.1x higher risk of blindness.
- Black residents have an 8.2% impairment rate, while White residents show 6.0%.
- Those with less than high school education experience 2.8x higher AMD prevalence.
- Female residents outnumber males in blindness counts, with 640,278 visually impaired women vs. 457,575 men.
These demographic nuances highlight specific groups that may require targeted support and outreach.
| Demographic Group | Estimated Impairment Rate |
|---|---|
| Black | 8.2% |
| Hispanic | 6.9% |
| White | 6.0% |
| Low-Income | 3.1x higher blindness risk overall |
| <High School Education | 2.8x AMD prevalence |
Regional Variation and Comparative Trends
Geographic location significantly affects access to services and vision outcomes, both within Virginia and in comparison to neighboring states.
- Southwest Virginia shows up to 3x higher vision loss rates than state averages.
- AMD hotspots in Southwest Virginia reach 6.7 cases per 1000 residents, compared to 4.1 statewide.
- Neighboring West Virginia reports a 3.58% overall acuity loss, while Maryland remains lower at 2.11%.
- Virginia ranks 23rd nationally in eye health metrics, placing it near the middle of the pack.
Such comparisons underscore both Virginia’s moderate performance nationwide and the intense disparities within its own borders.
| State | Acuity Loss Rate |
|---|---|
| Maryland | 2.11% |
| Virginia | ~3.0%–3.1% (Approx. statewide average) |
| West Virginia | 3.58% |
| North Carolina | 3.02% |
| Kentucky | 3.41% |
Disease-Specific Data
Breaking down vision loss by specific conditions reveals where the primary burden lies and how trends have changed over time.
- Diabetic Retinopathy: 4.1% prevalence statewide, a 0.3% increase above U.S. average.
- Glaucoma: 2.8% of Virginians, 0.2% below national averages.
- Cataract: 18.9% prevalence in line with national figures.
- AMD: 2.1% of the population, 0.4% above U.S. norms and rising due to an aging demographic.
These numbers highlight which conditions are most widespread and how they differ from nationwide patterns.
| Condition | Prevalence in Virginia | Comparison to U.S. |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic Retinopathy | 4.1% | +0.3% above U.S. |
| Glaucoma | 2.8% | -0.2% below U.S. |
| Cataract | 18.9% | Comparable |
| AMD | 2.1% | +0.4% above U.S. |
Healthcare Access and Service Utilization
Healthcare access plays a pivotal role in determining how many Virginians receive timely treatment and preventative care.
- Over 1.39 million Virginians live in Health Professional Shortage Areas, directly affecting eye care access.
- Optometrist density in Northern Virginia is 1:4,500 residents, while Southwest Virginia has 1:11,800.
- About 62% of urban optometrists accept Medicaid compared to 28% in rural counties.
- The average wait time for Medicaid-funded exams is 34 days.
These indicators demonstrate the degree to which Virginia’s vision health outcomes can vary depending on a patient’s geographic area and insurance status.
| Region | Optometrist-Patient Ratio | Medicaid Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Northern VA | 1:4,500 | 62% |
| Southwest VA | 1:11,800 | 28% |
Key Statistics Summary
- 7.2% of Virginians have uncorrected visual acuity at or below 20/40
- Rates of vision loss can be up to 3x higher in Southwest Virginia
- AMD prevalence stands at 2.1%, which is 0.4% higher than the U.S. average
- Over 1.39 million Virginians live in primary care shortage areas impacting ophthalmologic services
The data shows that while Virginia sits around national averages for overall visual impairment, there are notable regional imbalances and disease-specific variations. Widespread cataracts, rising AMD cases, and critical access issues in rural communities remain significant concerns for maintaining optimal vision health statewide.
In this article
