Updated on  February 25, 2025
5 min read

Vision Statistics in Nevada

7 sources cited
Vision Center is funded by our readers. We may earn commissions if you purchase something via one of our links.

Nevada’s vision health profile has shifted notably over the past two decades, with numerous data points highlighting changes in prevalence rates, demographic patterns, and the diverse factors influencing eye health. This article compiles recent and historical statistics to offer a data-focused perspective on vision difficulties, blindness, and related comorbidities in the state.

Below, we explore the prevalence of vision impairment, its distribution across different demographic groups, common ocular conditions, and how access to care shapes outcomes. Statistical evidence from multiple reputable sources is presented in lists and tables to ensure clarity and ease of reference.

Key Highlights

Here are several noteworthy data points before we dive into more detailed statistics.

  • 5.96% of Nevada residents reportedly experience vision difficulties, close to the 7.2% U.S. average.
  • An estimated 1.09 million people in Nevada are affected by blindness, a figure that aligns closely with national rates.
  • From 2005 to 2025, the prevalence of vision impairment in Nevada is reported to have increased from 5.1% to 7.05 million cases, indicating a significant growth driven by aging populations and chronic conditions.
  • By age 85 and older, nearly 20% of Nevada’s seniors experience permanent vision loss, reflecting the steep rise among older adults.

This snapshot underscores the importance of quantifying the prevalence and identifying which groups face heightened risk. The sections below provide expanded data tables and further breakdowns.

Prevalence of Vision Impairment and Blindness

Quantifying Nevada’s vision impairment rates is critical for comparing across age groups and neighboring states.

  • By 2025, an estimated 7.2% of U.S. residents face some form of vision loss, with Nevada’s rate at about 5.96%.
  • State data indicates 1.09 million individuals in Nevada are blind, a proportion comparable to national figures.
  • Nevada surpasses Utah’s 2.9% and Arizona’s 5.07% blindness rates, though it remains below some western regions where rates climb higher.
  • Female residents in Nevada account for 4.14 million cases of vision impairment, compared to 2.91 million among males.

Alongside these percentages, the burden appears to be especially pronounced among older age cohorts. The data table below shows how prevalence varies by age group in the state.

Age GroupApprox. Prevalence
18–39 Years4.4%
40–64 Years6.62%
65+ Years7.47%

As indicated, older populations show a markedly higher prevalence, with a notable jump in vision loss rates once individuals pass age 65.

Demographic Disparities

Statistical measures highlight wide-ranging disparities across gender, race, and socioeconomic status in Nevada.

  • Women in Nevada show a 1.4× higher incidence of vision impairment than men.
  • Black (non-Hispanic) residents record a 10.2% vision impairment prevalence, exceeding White (non-Hispanic) at 7.45% and Hispanic at 6.3%.
  • Uninsured adults face 2.3× higher risks of severe vision loss compared to their insured counterparts.
  • Smokers report vision difficulties at 8.44%, notably above the statewide rate of 5.96%.

These demographic trends underscore the importance of parsing socioeconomic factors and health behaviors that contribute to varying degrees of vision health. The table below summarizes racial and insurance-related data in Nevada.

GroupImpairment Rate
Black (Non-Hispanic)10.2%
White (Non-Hispanic)7.45%
Hispanic6.3%
Uninsured vs. Insured2.3× Higher Risk When Uninsured
Smokers vs. Non-Smokers8.44% vs. 5.96%

Such figures allow for targeted analysis of which groups may benefit from stronger preventative efforts and screening protocols.

Common Eye Diseases and Comorbidities

Many factors leading to vision impairment stem from specific conditions like AMD, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma.

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): About 50% of untreated neovascular AMD cases progress to macular atrophy within eight years, with up to 31% developing central involvement within five years.
  • Diabetic Retinopathy: Affects roughly 8.5% of Nevada’s diabetic population, above the national average of 7.8%.
  • Neovascular Glaucoma (NVG): Occurs more frequently among older adults (mean age 71) and uninsured populations, with 68% of severe cases among women.
  • Myopic Macular Degeneration (MMD): Globally, blindness from MMD is expected to rise from 3.3 million in 2015 to 18.5 million by 2050. Elevated myopia rates in Nevada may drive increased MMD diagnoses.

These conditions often overlap with lifestyle factors like poor glycemic control and cigarette smoking, amplifying the risk for severe visual impairment. The table below outlines approximate prevalence rates for key diseases in Nevada.

ConditionApprox. Prevalence in NV
Untreated Neovascular AMDProgression in ~50% of cases within 8 years
Diabetic Retinopathy8.5% of Diabetic Population
Neovascular Glaucoma68% Severe Cases in Women
Myopic Macular DegenerationRising Alongside High Myopia Trends

Monitoring these comorbidities provides a clearer snapshot of the challenges Nevada faces in curbing vision loss among at-risk groups.

Access to Eye Care and Service Distribution

Availability of eye care providers and insurance coverage influence residents’ ability to obtain regular check-ups and screenings.

  • Up to 23% of rural Nevadans lack reasonable access to an optometrist, compared to 9% in urban regions.
  • About 80% of routine eye exams can be covered by some insurance plans, yet 20% of low-income residents remain uninsured or underinsured.
  • Teleophthalmology, demonstrated to cut diabetic blindness by 90% in pilot programs elsewhere, remains under-deployed in many of Nevada’s rural counties.
  • Rural populations face additional hurdles due to fewer specialized clinics and longer travel times, potentially impacting early detection and treatment rates.

The table below compares rural and urban disparities in coverage and access, emphasizing the need for broader service distribution.

RegionLimited Access to OptometristsInsurance Coverage Gap
Rural Nevada23%Significant
Urban Nevada9%Moderate
Statewide TeleophthalmologyN/AUnderutilized

Geographic inequalities underscore how local infrastructure and provider availability can affect the rate of preventable vision loss.

Regional Comparisons

Adjacent states offer useful context for Nevada’s standing on vision impairment statistics.

  • Utah: Overall vision impairment of 2.9%, reflecting robust public health strategies and higher insurance coverage rates.
  • Arizona: Approximately 5.07% blindness prevalence, benefitting from comparatively advanced telemedicine solutions for eye care.
  • California: Sees higher figures among seniors, reaching 8.23% prevalence in older populations.
  • Nevada: At 5.96%, the state’s overall impairment rate rests between regional extremes.

While Nevada’s statistics do not exceed national averages across the board, certain pockets of rural and uninsured populations face disproportionately high rates of vision impairment.

StateOverall Vision Impairment
Utah2.9%
Arizona5.07%
Nevada5.96%
California (Seniors Only)8.23%

This regional context aids in understanding where Nevada ranks and how its unique demographic and economic landscape shapes these metrics.

Key Statistics Summary

  • Nevada’s vision impairment rate stands at 5.96%, with a notable climb from 5.1% since 2005.
  • Older populations (65+) in Nevada face a 7.47% rate of vision difficulties.
  • Black (non-Hispanic) residents show the highest prevalence at 10.2%.
  • Diabetic retinopathy impacts 8.5% of diabetic Nevadans.
  • Rural regions see 23% with limited access to optometrists, far above urban levels.

The data reflects a complex landscape, with strong variation by age, location, and socioeconomic status. These patterns highlight the continuing importance of well-distributed eye care services and early interventions for at-risk groups.

Updated on  February 25, 2025
7 sources cited
Updated on  February 25, 2025
The information provided on VisionCenter.org should not be used in place of actual information provided by a doctor or a specialist.